What can man
do to accept change within himself and the society in which he lives? This
question for me got answered as I watched an Oscar- winning Iranian Movie, ‘The Salesman’ directed
by Asghar Farhadi.
Unfolding the
drama, ‘The Death of a Salesman’ by Arthur Miller, within its story, the movie
speaks about how an individual can be defined by a single event. The story of a
young Iranian couple, Emad (Shahab Hosseini) and Rana (Taraneth Alidoosti) who
shift to a new home, is of order in life versus disorder that suddenly drops into
the normalcy of living like a bomb. Rana is violently assaulted when she is in
the bathroom because a stranger suddenly enters her privacy. It is a case of character
drop due to temptation of the man and obvious repulsiveness on the part of the
woman.
The details
of the what and the how are not revealed to the viewers. Much is left to
imagination when Rana is shown with wounds on her head on the hospital bed. Emad
wants to lodge a police complaint but Rana refuses in obvious fear of reliving
the incident to strange official men. Her expressions however show deep
emotional wounds. Apparently, the apartment earlier belonged to a promiscuous
lady and therefore the incident. It was a case of mistaken identity and
momentous temptation.
Emad then
moves on with his own amateur detective search and succeeds only to find a
senior citizen as the culprit. The man when caught realises the denial and
contradiction of his real self and his portrayed self to his family. He has an
old wife and a daughter of marriageable age. An apology follows, but Emad wants
revenge. ‘You have to admit what you did to my wife to your family’, is the
demand, if an apology is to be granted. The old man gets sick and goes through
trauma due to a faint heart. Rana then enters the scenario and tells Emad to
let go of the old man. She wants no kind of revenge. In fact she strangely
warns Emad that if he reveals the filth of the old man to his family, they will
part ways.
On the peripheral
level it all seems strange. An obvious question anybody would ask would be, ‘Why
let the accused go?’
The Arthur
Miller play running alongside shares a similar tale of a fifteen year old
affair before the real time of the play. Miller too focuses on the aftermath of
an affair. In the end his protagonist commits suicide being unable to deal with
the change in himself; a different self from what he would want everybody else
to believe. In the movie too the old man gets a stroke after Emad behind closed
doors gifts him a tight slap for what he had done to Rana.
Rana’s letting
go of the criminal is a letting go of revenge and pain that it would cause to
his family women. It’s a humiliated woman after all, who understands what
humiliation feels like and does not want two other innocent women to suffer
like she has.
The last
scene is where the artists, Emad and Rana are shown getting ready for another
show of Miller’s play in which they play the dramatic characters of Willy the
protagonists and his wife. The make-up artist is shown colouring their faces. Life
has to move on, as one has to make up for the loss or the differences one goes
through in the process of living. One has to make up in the end to replace the
pains one has suffered in the past. The only constant in life being change; it
becomes mandatory for man to accept it in peace. And composure of peace can
only be achieved when brushes are dipped in colours of forgiveness; because the
show must go on.
Difficult subject in difficult society.. breaking out of the vicious cycle of humiliation... handled with finess... leaving one wondering whether such compensated pardon enshrined in some jurisdictions emboldened the crime instead of preventing it. Emad and Rana moved on but will the crime too move on and on unless prevented by exemplary punishment that can't be by passed by compensated pardon...
ReplyDeleteagreed sir but not every criminal will find a Rana.
ReplyDelete